Cheney warned of major terrorist attack in the US in 1976

February 7, 2006

In 1976, a US army unit was ordered to find the “perfect terrorist plan“, using commercial airliners as weapons, and the twin towers as their target, as I posted yesterday. But what spurred this particular order? Well, could it be, that in that same year, when Cheney was then the chief of staff, he was issued with a warning that “it is impossible to rule out the possibility of a major terrorist attack in the United States”? Which came first? The order to find the “perfect terrorist plan”, or the warning to Cheney about a “major terrorist attack”? And more to the point, why was nothing done about this at the time? See all recent “A Logical Voice” posts


US Army devised a “911” plan in 1976

February 7, 2006

Rense brings us an interested read, about the US army being ordered to find the “perfect terrorist plan” using commercial airliners as weapons, and the twin towers as their target. And this was in 1976: “During the course of the terrorist plan we were devising, I made the statement to Lt. Teague that if the WTC was ever attacked like we planned, I’d go public. I was then physically assaulted and told never to reveal anything we were doing regarding the Twin Towers.” However, about a week later a strange turn of events occurred. For no apparent reason, McNiven claims his superiors completely changed their minds. “I was given the direct order that if the Twin Towers were ever attacked the way we discussed in the 1976 study, I was to do everything in my power to bring the similarities to the attention of the American people. “I have no idea why they changed their minds, but I was then emphatically told that this order was never to be rescinded – never – because those who would rescind it, would be the very same people who turned against the American people.” See all recent “A Logical Voice” posts

Bin Laden Interview

February 7, 2006

This is interesting, and was published in a Pakistani daily newspaper on the 28th September 2001: Bin Laden: AUTHENTIC INTERVIEW “I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle.” See all recent “A Logical Voice” posts

Media ignores “911” questions

February 7, 2006

As this writer states, Americans should be angry: Media ignore 9/11 questions Now we are hearing about another piece of the commission’s report that states that there were 52 warnings to the FAA before 9/11 that terrorists were going to use planes to attack the U.S. Why aren’t Americans outraged about this? What this means is that the president and his important cabinet members knew we were going to be attacked and did nothing. Is that what a president does to protect the American people? Why has the media downplayed this report? In addition, why was this report released three months after the election and appointment of Condoleezza Rice? Who as National Security Advisor, most assuredly, was given this information.

See all recent “A Logical Voice” posts

Bush regime hid “911” warnings until after election

February 7, 2006

It shouldn’t really come as any surprise to most, to know that the regime in Washington used the events of the 11th September 2001 to their own advantage as much as possible in the run up to the 2004 US presidential election, and hid all the warnings received from the public in the full knowledge that they had allowed those events to happen:

What we don’t know about 9/11 hurts us Bush administration hid 2001 terror warnings until after 2004 election

See all recent “A Logical Voice” posts

Hearings called for on new “911” evidence

February 7, 2006

Waxman calls for hearings on new 911 evidence

Reps Henry Waxman and Carolyn Maloney have called for hearings based on the new evidence of that the FTAA received 52 warnings mentioning Osama Bin Laden between April and September 10, 2001. Also, in the summer of 2001 the FAA sent a CD-ROM alert to airports mentioning the possibility of suicide hijackings.

See all recent “A Logical Voice” posts

Government insider says Bush authorised “9/11” attacks

February 7, 2006

Government Insider Says Bush Authorized 911 Attacks Keep in mind when reading this, that the man being interviewed is no two-bit internet conspiracy buff.

Stanley Hilton was a senior advisor to Sen Bob Dole (R) and has personally known Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz for decades. This courageous man has risked his professional reputation, and possibly his life, to get this information out to people.

AJ: He is back with us. He is former Bob Dole’s chief of staff, very successful counselor, lawyer. He represents hundreds of the victims families of 9/11. He is suing Bush for involvement in 9/11. Now a major Zogby poll out – half of New Yorkers think the government was involved in 9/11. And joining us for the next 35 minutes, into the next hour, is Stanley Hilton. Stanley, it’s great to have you on with us.

SH: Glad to be on.

AJ: We’ll have to recap this when we start the next hour, but just in a nutshell, you have a lawsuit going, you’ve deposed a lot of military officers. You know the truth of 9/11. Just in a nutshell, what is your case alleging?

SH: Our case is alleging that Bush and his puppets Rice and Cheney and Mueller and Rumsfeld and so forth, Tenet, were all involved not only in aiding and abetting and allowing 9/11 to happen but in actually ordering it to happen. Bush personally ordered it to happen. We have some very incriminating documents as well as eye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered this event to happen in order to gain political advantage, to pursue a bogus political agenda on behalf of the neocons and their deluded thinking in the Middle East. I also wanted to point out that, just quickly, I went to school with some of these neocons. At the University of Chicago, in the late 60s with Wolfowitz and Feith and several of the others and so I know these people personally. And we used to talk about this stuff all of the time. And I did my senior thesis on this very subject – how to turn the U.S. into a presidential dictatorship by manufacturing a bogus Pearl Harbor event. So, technically this has been in the planning at least 35 years.

AJ: That’s right. They were all Straussian followers of a Nazi-like professor. And now they are setting it up here in America. Stanley, I know you deposed a lot of people and you’ve got your $7 million dollar lawsuit with hundreds of the victim’s families involved….

SH: 7 billion, 7 billion

AJ: Yeah, 7 billion. Can you go over some of the new and incriminating evidence you’ve got of them ordering the attack?

SH: Yes, let me just say that this is a taxpayers’ class action lawsuit as well as a suit on behalf of the families and the basic three arguments are they violated the Constitution by ordering this event. And secondly that they [garbled] fraudulent Federal Claims Act, Title 31 of the U.S. Code in which Bush presented false and fraudulent evidence to Congress to get the Iraq war authorization. And, of course, he related it to 9/11 and claimed that Saddam was involved with that, and all these lies.

AJ: Tell you what, stay there. Stanley, we’ve got to break. Let’s come back and get into the evidence

The MP3 of this interview is available at

Questions for the Bush regime

February 7, 2006

Republican Senator Richard Shelby, a senior member of the Joint Intelligence Committee investigating the events of the 11th September 2001 stated that the Bush regime had all the available evidence necessary to prevent what happened that day, but did nothing to prevent it. Comments like these from a senior Republican certainly raise important points about the validity of the argument expressed by Bush, Rice, Fleischer etc.. that those events could not have been prevented.

On the 27th October 2004, an alliance of 100 prominent Americans and 40 family members of those killed on that dreadful day released a “911 truth statement”, calling for immediate inquiry into evidence that suggests high-level government officials may have deliberately allowed the September 11th attacks to occur. I certainly agree that an inquiry such as this should have been allowed well before now if the regime had nothing to hide.

There are 12 important questions the signatories to the statement want answering, these are:

1. Why were standard operating procedures for dealing with hijacked airliners not followed that day?

2. Why were the extensive missile batteries and air defenses reportedly deployed around the Pentagon not activated during the attack?

3. Why did the Secret Service allow Bush to complete his elementary school visit, apparently unconcerned about his safety or that of the schoolchildren?

4. Why hasn’t a single person been fired, penalized, or reprimanded for the gross incompetence we witnessed that day?

5. Why haven’t authorities in the U.S. and abroad published the results of multiple investigations into trading that strongly suggested foreknowledge of specific details of the 9/11 attacks, resulting in tens of millions of dollars of traceable gains?

6. Why has Sibel Edmonds, a former FBI translator who claims to have knowledge of advance warnings, been publicly silenced with a gag order requested by Attorney General Ashcroft and granted by a Bush-appointed judge?

7. How could Flight 77, which reportedly hit the Pentagon, have flown back towards Washington D.C. for 40 minutes without being detected by the FAA’s radar or the even superior radar possessed by the US military?

8. How were the FBI and CIA able to release the names and photos of the alleged hijackers within hours, as well as to visit houses, restaurants, and flight schools they were known to frequent?

9. What happened to the over 20 documented warnings given our government by 14 foreign intelligence agencies or heads of state?

10. Why did the Bush administration cover up the fact that the head of the Pakistani intelligence agency was in Washington the week of 9/11 and reportedly had $100,000 wired to Mohamed Atta, considered the ringleader of the hijackers?

11. Why did the 911 Commission fail to address most of the questions posed by the families of the victims, in addition to almost all of the questions posed here?

12. Why was Philip Zelikow chosen to be the Executive Director of the ostensibly independent 911 Commission although he had co-authored a book with Condoleezza Rice? It would be interesting to hear the answers don’t you think?

British “911” sceptics visit Sedgefield

February 7, 2006

From UK 9-11 Skeptics Pay Tony Blair A Visit :

In an unprecedented move, 17,000 “Confronting The Evidence” DVDs were distributed to the voters of Sedgefield in an attempt to educate Blair’s constituency about the 9-11 cover-up and to contribute towards efforts to unseat the Prime Minister.

Hello world!

February 6, 2006

Welcome to This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!